Sanral in denial? Worrisome!

You might be growing tired of reading about e-tolls and the South African National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) โ but, as Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) has noted in a media statement, the Agencyโs head doesnโt appear to know what its tail is doing: landing it in the headlines again โฆ
JPSAโs remark follows Sanralโs denial that it has commenced issuing final demands and summonses โ as reported on the โHuman IPO website: the Agencyโs โretaliationโ against a previous statement where JPSA notes that the Sanral Violations Processing Centre has started sending out e-mails that clearly state: โA final demand has been issued in regard to your e-toll Violations Processing Centre (VPC) Accountโ and โA summons has been issuedโ.
(The e-mail messages were received, by a company that allegedly has an outstanding e-toll bill with Sanral, in two separate e-mails โ sent on May 2, within seconds of one another.)
However, as JPSA points out, the statements made by Sanralโs Vusi Mona that โSanral has not issued final demand invoices, however, we have issued communication as final reminder of outstanding paymentโ and โWe also have not requested any summons to be issued by the National Prosecuting Authorityโ are somewhat worrisome. If this is true, then it simply means that the Sanral VPC is lying to people in its e-mails.
โThis constitutes both unreasonably excessive conduct and intimidation, on the part of the VPC, since it has made threats and statements of the fact in its e-mails, to the effect that โa letter of demand has been issuedโ and โa summons has been issuedโ,โ JPSA points out. โThese e-mails were indeed received by a company on May 2, and there is no denying this fact.โ
JPSA adds that it verified and confirmed that the e-mails originated from bulkmail.tmtservices.co.za and that it wouldnโt have put out its original release prior to checking the authenticity of the e-mails. โWe understand that TMT Services, a Kapsch-owned company, is responsible for running the VPC.โ
JPSA continues: โWhilst it is not unusual for TMT Services to engage in intimidation tactics and stray from the truth in order to achieve its objectives, there are laws prohibiting such tactics, but, for some reason, TMT Services and others donโt seem to be of the opinion that laws apply to them.
โIf what Sanral says about not having issued any final demands or having approached the National Prosecuting Authority for the issue of summonses is true, then surely TMT Services can be said to be deliberately lying to members of the public in the intimidating e-mails that it sends to them?โ
Published by
Focus on Transport
focusmagsa
